Internal advisor
How much do legal leaders trust artificial intelligence to make high-stakes decisions? New study sheds light
According to a new study of 500 legal and business executives, only 37% of legal executives trust the use of generative artificial intelligence in high-stakes decisions, showing limited confidence in its ability to interpret complex issues. (Image from Shutterstock)
According to a new study of 500 legal and business executives, only 37% of legal executives trust the use of generative artificial intelligence in high-stakes decisions, showing limited confidence in its ability to interpret complex issues.
THE Paragon Legal studylegal services company that advises businesses and corporate legal departments, also reveals that:
• 39% say their organization is adopting AI too quickly.
• 36% have used AI-generated information that they don’t fully trust.
• 37% have restricted or disabled AI tools due to compliance concerns.
“As artificial intelligence becomes more deeply integrated into legal practice, leaders are increasingly questioning where to draw the line between innovation and integrity,” according to the study. “Trust in AI remains cautious, especially when human judgment and accountability are at stake.”
Nearly two-thirds (65%) of legal and business leaders who responded to the survey say AI should be used for legal assistance, rather than decisions made by a lawyer. However, the study also shows that 41% admit to reclassifying their tasks to facilitate AI adoption.
According to the study, one of the key takeaways for legal leaders is to “establish clear accountability frameworks before allowing AI to influence substantive legal decisions.” It also suggests that “human approval should remain the norm, particularly when it comes to regulatory interpretation or customer impact.”
Write a letter to the editor, share a tip or update, or report an error.
