Apple Has Taken Legal Action Against Popular Youtuber Jon Prosser and Michael Ramacciotti, Alleging That the Pair Stole and Leaked Confidential Information About the Company’s Upcoming iPhone Software Update, iOS 26. The Lawsuit, Filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California Ramacciotti of using unauthorized access to an Apple Employee phone to obtain sensitive details from iOS 26, which he then sent to Prosser. Prosser then shared this information on his YouTube channel, Front Page Tech.
The information disclosed included details on the unpublished features and conceptions for iOS 26, which Apple plans to publish publicly in the fall of 2025. Apple affirms that the flight caused “irreparable damage” by revealing plans of unfinished and secret products before they are ready. The company requests damages, although the specific amount has not been disclosed. Apple highlighted its commitment to confidentiality and to protect its commercial secrets, generally not commenting publicly beyond its official legal deposits.
Jon Prosser denied any reprehensible act, declaring that he had not plotted to steal information and was not aware of the way he had been obtained. He thinks that the information he received was correct and that the publication remained within the legal limits of journalism. Prosser expressed his eagerness to present his side of the case in court. Neither Ramacciotti nor a first -page technology representative commented on the issue.
The video detailing the iOS 26 features was downloaded from the prosser channel in January 2025 and sparked an important discussion in the technological community. Apple became aware of the flight in April 2025 after being alerted by an anonymous denunciator. According to court documents, the denunciator informed Apple that Apple that data had been accessed using a work telephone of a nearby friend, who was an Apple employee at the time.
Apple alleges that Prosser has led Ramacciotti to secure and relay information, with Ramacciotti accused of many crimes and regulations of the company. Society affirms that the protection of its intellectual property is essential to its innovation and its position on the market. The two defendants are accused of having acted “in a malicious and illegal way”, Apple arguing that the revelation of its commercial secrets would harm its competitiveness and would erode confidence between employees and business partners.
In a similar incident in 2021, Apple accused a former employee, Simon Lancaster, of disclosing confidential information on companies to a journalist. The company said that Lancaster had abused its position and that the trust had placed it to share trade secrets sensitive to personal purposes. This last trial underlines the strict Apple measures to protect its commercial secrets and the lengths to which the company is willing to protect its proprietary information.
The incident recalls the importance of securing development devices and the potential consequences of the poorly managed confidential information. As the legal battle takes place, the two parties should present their evidence and arguments in court, with the result likely to create a precedent for future affairs involving a secret commercial flight and unauthorized access to proprietary information.
